Urol. praxi, 2012; 13(3): 127-129

Is stone density on CT examination a predictive factor for chemical composition?

MUDr.Jan Fogl1, MUDr.Vladimír Šámal1, MUDr.Jan Mečl1, MUDr.Josef Šulc2
1 Urologické oddělení, Krajská nemocnice Liberec, a.s.
2 NsP Česká Lípa, a.s.

Introduction: Today’s modern methods of diagnosing urolithiasis mainly utilize spiral CT examination. In addition to common morphological

data, it is possible to determine stone density by means of the examination. The paper deals with a possible correlation between

stone density and its chemical composition.

Material and method: The authors present a retrospective review of outcomes of the chemical composition of stones in 154 patients

from two centres who underwent surgical treatment for urolithiasis or spontaneously passed stones in their urine. In all patients, data on

stone density were obtained from CT examinations performed at the time of diagnosis of urolithiasis or during follow-up evaluations.

Results: In the reported group, a statistically significant difference was shown between the density of urate and calcium stones (p <

0.05). The differences in densities between the other groups of stones were not statistically significant. A correlation between stone

density and its chemical composition failed to be confirmed.

Conclusion: The use of non-contrast spiral CT in diagnosing urolithiasis allows to distinguish between urate and calcium stones. Predicting

the chemical composition of a stone is an important factor in selecting an optimal therapeutic strategy.

Keywords: spiral CT, diagnosis, chemical composition, urolithiasis, stone density, Housfield units

Published: June 4, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Fogl J, Šámal V, Mečl J, Šulc J. Is stone density on CT examination a predictive factor for chemical composition? Urol. praxi. 2012;13(3):127-129.
Download citation

References

  1. Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Anderson KR, et al. The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol 1998; 159: 735-740. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Mitcheson HD, Zamenhof RG, Bankoff MS, Prien EL. Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by computherized tomography. J Urol 1983; 130: 814-819. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Mostafavi MR, Ernst RD, Saltzman B. Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 1998; 159: 673-675. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Grosjean R, Bauer B, Guerra RM, et al. Characterization of human renal stones with MDCT: Advantage of dual energy and limitations due to respiratory motion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 720-728. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Saw KC, McAteer JA, Monga AG, Chua GT, Lingeman JE, Williams JC Jr. Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation. AJR 2000; 175: 329-332. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Bellin MF, Renard-Penna R, Donory P, et al. Helical CT evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary tract calculi with a discriminant analysis of CT attenuation values and density. EUR Radiol. 2004; 14: 2134-2140. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Newhouse JH, Prien EL, Amis ES Jr, Dretler SP, Prister RC. Computed tomographic analysis of urinary calculi. AJR 1984; 142: 545-548. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Hillman BJ, Drach GW, Tracey P, Gaines JA, Computed tomographic analysis of renal calculi. AJR 1984; 142: 549-552. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Sheir KZ, Mansour O, Madbouly K, Elsolby E, Anděl-Khalek M. Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by noncontrast spiral computerized tomography. Urol Res 2005; 33: 99-104. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Nakada SY, Hoff DG, Attai S, et al. Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting. Urology 2000; 55: 816-819. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Motley G, Dalrymple N, Kresliny C, Fischer J, Hormon W. Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. Urology 2001; 58: 170-173. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Ferda J, Flor T, Kreuzberg B. Zobrazení tkání výpočetní tomografií s duální energií záření - první zkušenosti z klinického využití. Ces Radiol 2008; 62(1): 11-22. Go to original source...
  13. Primak AN, Fletcher JG, Vrtiska TJ, Dzyubak OP, Lidské JC, Jackson ME, Williams JC Jr., McCollough CH. Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT. Acad Radiol.2007; 14: 1441-1447. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Hidas G, Eliahou R, Duvdevani M, Coulon P, Lemaitre L, Gofrit ON, Podle D, Sosna J. Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy CT. Radiology 2010; 257: 394-401. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Matlaga BR, Kawamoto S, Fishman E. Dual source computed tomography: A novel technique to determine stone composition.Urology 2008; 72: 1164-1168. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Broďák M, Dvořák P, Holub L. Spirální CT u ledvinné koliky. Urol. praxi 2004; 2: 51-53.
  17. Petřík A. Diagnostika a terapie urolitiázy. Urol. prax, 2011; 12(3): 173-179.
  18. Bednářová A, Ferda J, Kreuzberg B, Klečka J, Hora M. Chemická analýza ledvinných konkrementů pomocí CT s duální energií záření - naše zkušenosti. Ces radiol 2011; 65(4): 251-255.




Urology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.