Urol. praxi, 2011; 12(2): 120-122

Functional outcomes of retropubic prostatectomy performed

prostatektomie provedené na Urologické
klinice FN a LF UK v Hradci Králové

at the Department of the University Hospital in Hradec Králové

Radical retropubic prostatectomy is carried out more commonly in younger patients without serious comorbidities. There is very important

the satisfied functional result of surgery, not only oncologic. The most common complications are the urine incontinence, the erectile

dysfunction, the anastomotic stricture and the overactive bladder symptoms. The authors have executed retrospective analysis of 489 patients

after radical retropubic prostatectomy. The incidence of incontinence was 3 %, erectile dysfunction 63 %, anastomotic strictures 7 %

and overactive detrusor < 3 %. The great majority of these patients were successfully treated by pharmacologic or surgical management.

Keywords: radical prostatectomy, incontinence, erectile dysfunction, anastomotic stricture

Published: April 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
provedené na Urologické P. Functional outcomes of retropubic prostatectomy performed. Urol. praxi. 2011;12(2):120-122.
Download citation

References

  1. Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, Boyle P. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol. 2007; 18(3): 581-592. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol. 1982; 128(3): 492-497. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bauer RM, Bastian PJ, Gozzi C, Stief CG. Postprostatectomy incontinence: all about diagnosis and management. Eur Urol. 2009; 55(2): 322-333. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Ficazzola MA, Nitti VW. The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings. J Urol. 1998; 160(4): 1317-1320. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Foote J, Yun S, Leach GE. Postprostatectomy incontinence. Pathophysiology, evaluation, and management. Urol Clin North Am. 1991; 18(2): 229-241. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Deliveliotis C, Protogerou V, Alargof E, Varkarakis J. Radical prostatectomy: bladder neck preservation and puboprostatic ligament sparing - effects on continence and positive margins. Urology. 2002; 60(5): 855-858. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Selli C, De Antoni P, Moro U, Macchiarella A, Giannarini G, Crisci A. Role of bladder neck preservation in urinary continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004; 38(1): 32-37. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Poon M, Ruckle H, Bamshad BR, Tsai C, Webster R, Lui P. Radical retropubic prostatectomy: bladder-neck preservation versus reconstruction. J Urol 2000; 163: 194-198. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Brasa KG, Petsch M, Lim A, Civantos F, Soloway MS. Bladder neck preservation following radical prostatectomy: continence and margins. Eur Urol 1995; 28: 202-208. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. O'Donnell PD, Finan BF. Continence following nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1989; 142: 1227-1228. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Briganti A, Capitanio U, Chun FK, Karakiewicz PI, Salonia A, Bianchi M, Cestari A, Guazzoni G, Rigatti P, Montorsi F. Prediction of sexual function after radical prostatectomy. Cancer. 2009; 115(13 Suppl): 3150-3159. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, Badani KK, Fumo M, Bhandari M, Peabody JO. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol. 2007; 51(3): 648-657. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Chabert CC, Merrilees DA, Neill MG, Eden CG. Curtain dissection of the lateral prostatic fascia and potency after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a veil of mystery. BJU Int. 2008; 101(10): 1285-1288. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Montorsi F, Salonia A, Suardi N, Gallina A, Zanni G, Briganti A, Deho' F, Naspro R, Farina E, Rigatti P. Improving the preservation of the urethral sphincter and neurovascular bundles during open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2005; 48(6): 938-945. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Kessler TM, Burkhard FC, Studer UE. Nerve-sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007; 51(1): 90-97. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Rassweiler J, Marrero R, Hammady A, Erdogru T, Teber D, Frede T. Transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: ascending technique. J Endourol. 2004; 18(7): 593-599. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Rhee HK, Triaca V, Sorcini A, Tuerk IA. Transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: descending technique. J Endourol. 2004; 18(7): 601-604. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Altinova S, Serefoglu EC, Ozdemir AT, Atmaca AF, Akbulut Z, Balbay MD. Factors affecting urethral stricture development after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2009; 41(4): 881-884. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Huang G, Lepor H. Factors predisposing to the development of anastomotic strictures in a single-surgeon series of radical retropubic prostatectomies. BJU Int. 2006; 97(2): 255-258. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Issa MM. Technological advances in transurethral resection of the prostate: Bipolar versus monopolar TURP. J Endourol 2008; 22: 1587-1595. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Porena M, Mearini E, Mearini L, Vianello A, Giannantoni A. Voiding dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy: more than external urethral sphincter deficiency. Eur Urol. 2007; 52(1): 38-45. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Urology for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.